multichannel merchant
RSS Feeds Advertising | Contact Us | DIRECT | E-Newsletters | Subscribe
advanced
search
 

CWD Finds Fitting Way to Reduce Returns
Apr 20, 2005 11:09 AM , By Margery Weinstein

All catalogers would like to reduce their return rates, but Richmond, VA-based children's apparel cataloger Children's Wear Digest tries to head off the likelihood of returns even before shipping the merchandise to customers. About eight years ago the company instituted an inventory quality control program in which a sample run of product new to the catalog is first sent to the corporate office for a fit and sizing inspection before being approved as salable merchandise. The program has lowered the returns rate by at least 2%, says CWD president Jim Klaus.

The samples in all sizes of the product are placed on "standard fit" mannequins, or mannequins sized in exact proportion to the retail industry's definition of each clothing size. This inspection process alerts CWD to any problems or irregularities with fit even before customers place orders. If a children's size 4 dress, for example, is standard size-appropriate in its fit of the waist, but longer than it should be on the mannequin, a note on that sizing detail is made, and published in the catalog and Website, as well as told to reps. In some cases, such as if the neck hole is too small to fit over the mannequins, CWD won't accept the inventory, Klaus says. "There's no point sending out something that has a serious flaw."

CWD's inventory quality control protocol is especially important given that the company does not manufacture its own merchandise. Klaus says that its suppliers, including Mulberribush, Lacoste, and Ralph Lauren, all size merchandise slightly different. "We can't tell Lacoste to make a polo shirt that fits exactly like Ralph Lauren," he notes.



Back to Top

BROWSE ISSUES
May 1, 2007 Cover April 1, 2008 Cover March 1, 2008 Cover February 1, 2008 Cover January 1, 2008 Cover December 1, 2007 Cover November 1, 2007 Cover
  May 1, 2008 April 1, 2008 March 1, 2008 February 1, 2008 January 1, 2008 December 1, 2007 November 1, 2007


BROWSE E-NEWSLETTERS
   
  View Sample Subscribe View Sample Subscribe View Sample Subscribe View Sample Subscribe View Sample Subscribe View Sample
Subscribe
 

BROWSE BACK ISSUES