Multichannel Merchant
  • Ecommerce
  • Marketing
  • Operations & Fulfillment
  • Sector Spotlights
HOME
  • Ecommerce
    • Marketplaces
    • Mobile
    • Payment
    • Security
    • Shopping Cart
    • Usability
  • Marketing
    • Advertising
    • Catalog
    • Content Marketing
    • Email
    • Search
    • Social
    • Video
  • Operations & Fulfillment
    • Contact Center
    • Customer Experience
    • Delivery
    • Distribution Center
    • Fulfillment
    • Order Management
    • Returns
    • Shipping
    • Workforce
    • Sector Spotlights
  • Resource Center
    • Media & Marketing Events
    • MCM Advisory Board
    • Media Kit
    • Podcasts
    • Webinars
    • Research
    • Submit A Release
    • Videos
    • Jobs
  • Subscribe

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

FTC: ISPs Better at Blocking “Harvesters”

Ken Magill
November 30, 2005

Spammers are as busy as ever harvesting e-mail addresses, but Internet service providers block the vast majority of their attempts to flood consumers’ inboxes, according to a report released this week by the Federal Trade Commission.

The FTC report also found that consumers who post their Internet addresses on the Internet can prevent them from being harvested by using a technique called masking.

In a study using 150 undercover e-mail accounts — 50 each at one ISP that uses no antispam filters and at two ISPs that do use spam filters — the FTC posted the addresses on 50 Websites, including message boards, chat rooms, blogs, and USENET groups. These are places where spammers typically harvest e-mail addresses.

After five weeks, e-mail addresses at the unfiltered ISP received 8,885 spam e-mails, while the 50 addresses at one of the filtered ISPs received 1,208, and the 50 addresses at the other filtered ISP received 422. The first ISP that used filters blocked 86.4% of the spam and the second blocked 95.2%, according to the FTC. The commission did not identify any of the ISPs in the study.

The study also tested whether masking e-mail addresses — altering them by, for example, changing “@” to “at” to confuse automated software — could help e-mail users prevent having their addresses harvested. After five weeks, unaltered addresses received 6,400 pieces of spam, while the altered addresses received one.

“This encouraging result suggests that antispam technologies may be dramatically reducing the burden of spam on consumers,” said the report.

Webinars

Step Up Your Fraud Prevention Approach in 2024

Unleashing GenAI Magic: Transforming Visual Commerce for Unbeatable Customer Experiences

Returns Challenges, Opportunities Covered in New Webinar

Multichannel Merchant: Editorial Spotlight on Returns in 2023

Webinar: The Generative AI Genie is Out of the Bottle

Latest Research

High-Touch Returns Become Point of Differentiation for 3PLs

Goods-To-Person E-Fulfillment Technology: Flexing Along With Demand

Foreign Trade Zones: A Hidden Gem for Retailers

Automation and Robotics: Moving Past Limitations to Gains

Shipping Capacity Management: The Outlook for 2022 Peak Season

Blogs

Content-Based Marketing: A Post-Cookie Evolution

Generative AI in Customer Service: A Balanced Blueprint

Why Digital Wallets are The Key to Modern Loyalty Marketing

ESG and Your Supply Chain: 3 Steps to a Streamlined Strategy

Retail Cyber Threats: 5 Ways to Protect Your Business

About us

  • About us
  • Press Releases
  • Privacy Policy
  • Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging
  • Accessibility Statement

Events

  • Media & Marketing Events

Related Sites

  • Chief Marketer
  • Event Marketer
  • LeadsCon
  • LeadsCouncil
  • PR News

Directories / Jobs

  • MCM Source Directory
  • Top 3PLs
  • Jobs

Sign up for MCM

Get the Ecommerce, Marketing & Operations info you need when you need it.
  • About us
  • Jobs

Follow Us

© 2025 Access Intelligence, LLC - All Rights Reserved.